Primer “Musek” ali kako uničiti vtis strokovnjaka “u pet minuta”

22. marec 2012  

Za začetek priznanje: debate o Družinskem zakoniku imam že vrh glave. Samemu sebi sem tečen in kot resen osebni defekt jemljem dejstvo, da me homofobi tolikokrat spravijo v efekt, ko prav na debelo preklinjam in skačem v zrak. Niso vredni, res ne, a… V zadnjih dneh sem se cenzuriral že n-krat, saj se a) nočem spuščati na to raven b) nočem težiti z eno temo vedno znova in znova.

A ker smo vsi grešniki, samoomejevanje tudi meni ne gre najbolje. Komaj čakam na predreferendumski molk, pa naj bo, kar pač mora biti.

No, ne še takoj. Sledi obravnava sporočila (priporočam branje pred nadaljevanjem), ki so ga danes v javnost kot odziv na stališča Društva psihologov Slovenije poslali Ivo Kerže, Bogdan Žorž in Janek Musek. Janek Musek je eden izmed tistih redkih slovenski psihologov, ki nasprotujejo Družinskemu zakoniku. In krasen, briljanten primer, kaj se zgodi z znanostjo, ko se jo žrtvuje na oltarju predsodkov. Trganje iz konteksta, selektivno izbiranje stavkov in ugotovitev, manipuliranje in zavajanje…  Musek bi moral biti po kampanji o Družinskem zakoniku gobavec slovenske psihologije. Strokovna poštenost je šla v closet.

Musek & Co.

Izjava pri tem zamolči študijo (Golombok, Tasker, 1996, 1997), ki jo v omenjeni raziskavi (na strani 10) navaja Pattersonova. Ugotavlja, da je odprtost za prevzemanje homoseksualne usmerjenosti pri otrocih, ki rastejo v okviru homoseksualne zveze, za 64 odstotkov večje kot pri tistih iz heteroseksualne.

Resnica? To:

Do parents influence the sexual orientation of their children? Findings from a longitudinal study of lesbian families

Although those from lesbian families were more likely to explore same-sex relationships, particularly if their childhood family environment was characterized by an openness and acceptance of lesbian and gay relationships, the large majority of children who grew up in lesbian families identified as heterosexual.

Ali povedano še enkrat, ista študija (1996):

The commonly held assumption that children brought up by lesbian mothers will themselves grow up to be lesbian or gay in not supported by the finding of the study.

Ali Tasker v novejšem znanstvenem članku:

Children in Lesbian-Led Families: A Review

Sexual orientation was considered along four main dimensions: sexual attraction and fantasies (including early crushes), consideration of the possibilities of lesbian or gay relationships, sexual experience and sexual identity.
No differences were found between the proportions of young adults from lesbian and heterosexual families who reported feelings of attraction towards someone the same sex as themselves. However, those who had grown up in a lesbian family were more likely to consider the possibility of having lesbian or gay relationships and indeed to do so. Five of the young women and one of the young men from lesbian-mother families had themselves had a same gender relationship. Nevertheless all of the children in lesbian-led families had also experienced heterosexual relationships, and the vast majority of young adults brought up by a lesbian mother identified as heterosexual (only two young women identified as lesbian and none of the young men identified as gay or bisexual).

Those young people from lesbian-led families who were most likely to show an interest in same gender relationships were those whose mothers had previously reported in the first phase of the longitudinal study that they were more open within the home about having lesbian relationships, or that they had no preference for their child’s future sexual orientation. Reflecting on their own sexual history in the follow-up study interviews many of the young people from lesbian-led families felt that they could make more informed choices about sexual relationships, both heterosexual and homosexual, because of greater openness and acceptance in their family.

Musek & Co. strike again!

Referenčna študija iz leta 2001 (Stacey, Biblarz), ki je izjava DPS ne navaja, poudari, da je to razlika, ki se je ne da spregledati (»their openness to this possibility is striking«, str. 170).

Študija Stacey in Biblarz (2001), naslednji stavek, ki ga Musek & Co. slučajno ”spregledajo”:

If these young adults raised by lesbian mothers were more open to a broad range of sexual possibilities, they were not statistically more likely to self-identify as bisexual, lesbian, or gay.

Musek & Co. briljirajo dalje:

Naslednja poteza je nasilnost teh zvez. P. Tjaden in N. Thoennes v svojem prispevku iz leta 2000 ugotavljata, da je nasilje v homoseksualnih zvezah pogostejše kot v heteroseksualnih (razmerje je 21,5 % proti 7,1 %). Okolje, v katerem je nasilje bolj pogosto, seveda škodljivo vpliva na razvoj otroka.

Kaj sta avtorja res ugotovila?

Women living with female intimate partners experience less intimate partner violence than women living with male intimate partners. Slightly more than 11 percent of the women who had lived with a woman as part of a couple reported being raped, physically assaulted, and/or stalked by a female cohabitant, but 30.4 percent of the women who had married or lived with a man as part of a couple reported such violence by a husband or male cohabitant. These findings suggest that lesbian couples experience less intimate partner violence than do heterosexual couples; however, more research is needed to support or refute this conclusion.

Men living with male intimate partners experience more intimate partner violence than do
men who live with female intimate partners. Approximately 15 percent of the men who had lived with a man as a couple reportedy being raped, physically assaulted, and/or stalked by a male cohabitant, while 7.7 percent of the men who had married or lived with a woman as a couple reported such violence by a wife or female cohabitant. These findings, combined with those presented in the previous bullet, provide further evidence that intimate partner violence is perpetrated primarily by men, whether against male or female intimates. Thus, strategies for preventing intimate partner violence should focus on risks posed by men.

Eto, moški smo problematični. Hetero ali gej. Drage ženske, čas je, da postanete lezbijke. Vse ;) Vam ne diši?! Pomislite vendar na otroke!

Musek & Co:

Prav tako pomembno je uvideti, da je (moška) homoseksualna populacija ena izmed najbolj rizičnih za obolelost za virus HIV. Ravno skozi to populacijo se v Evropi zlasti v zadnjem času HIV najhitreje širi, kot poudarja letno poročilo organizacije UNAIDS za leto 2010. Število novih obolenj za HIV pri tej populaciji je med letoma 2000 in 2006 poskočilo za 86%!

O lezbijkah pa nič, kajne? Ker bi se moralo zapisati, da so pa te najmanj ogrožene? Lahko potem zapeljemo zaključek, da se da otroke samo lezbijkam, gospod Musek?

Ker imam strašenja z okuženimi poln kufer, si bom privoščil višek nesramnosti: dragi Musek &Co., za razliko od mnogih pripadnikov verske organizacije, ki vas podpira pri razširjanju laži in potvorb, geji in lezbijke z otroki ne seksajo, HIV pa se na straniščni školjki tudi ne prenaša. In res ni težko najti ameriških ugotovitev, ki kažejo, da so tudi katoliški duhovniki nadpovprečno okuženi s HIV-om.

4 odzivi na “Primer “Musek” ali kako uničiti vtis strokovnjaka “u pet minuta””

  1. don Carlos pravi:

    Tele nebuloze, dasiravno polne izkrivljanj, vsaj delujejo strokovno – na prvi pogled. Pa se preberite, kaj vrli Kerže pisari po drugih koncih, potem se pa vprašajte, če slučajno ne plujemo na eni taki podalpski Narrenschiff … Predlagam na primer Keržetov zadnji zmazek na casnik.si. In to naj bi bil doktor filozofije …

  2. Jure Mesarič pravi:

    Lah si je s casnik.si postavil lep spomenik. V imenu pluralnosti, ofkors.

    Izbira je res pestra. Grašič, Kerže, Erlah, Čerin, … če bi bili afganistanski muslimani, bi ti pluralizirali z dinamitom za pasom.

  3. Tomaž pravi:

    To je za tebe višek nesramnosti? Napisati, da potrebni župniki s svojimi blagoslovljenimi tacami šlatajo dekliče in fantkom pred nosovi opeletajo s svojimi zazelhanimi curaki, po pedofilskih zabavicah pa na spletu objavljajo svetohlinske traktate o varovanju nedolžne dečice pred pedri?

  4. Jure Mesarič pravi:

    Jaz sem lepo vzgojen peder, tko da me je ob pisanju zadnjega odstavka skoraj fršlog.

    ;)

Dodaj odgovor