Ampak, dva kurca sta višek, dve pizdi pa luksuz (kar pa ne velja, če je eden od kurcev mladoleten, potem se temu reče “izkaz najvišje Božje ljubezni”).

Kakorkoli – vsak naj živi, kakor sam hoče. In če bo samo enemu otroku lepše, ker ga v ranem otroštvu/mladosti ne bo psihično in fizično zlorabljal in maltretiral njegov pijani ata, ki pije, da pozabi, zakaj pije… Če bo samo enemu otroku lepše, je zakonik DOBER.

Res pa je tudi, da so si slovenski geji sami krivi za trenutno stanje. Na ulice, pa vsak dan protestirat pred parlament. Aktivno se pejte demokracijo, kot sem Juretu že nekajkrat predlagal – lahko je namreč za monitorjem insta-pameti stresat iz rokava.

na njeno nesrečo poznam študijo, na katero se sklicuje. na njeno nesrečo, gospa Hansen v tipični maniri manipulira.

da, otroci iz istospolnih družin imajo več izkušenj pri eksperimentiranju z istospolnimi partnerji (kar je že zdravorazumsko logično – če to ni smrtni greh, boš pač prej poiskusil) a, in to je ključno, razlik v spolni usmerjenosti ni. delež istospolno usmerjenih je še vedno enak kot pri otrocih, ki so odraščali v “običajnih” družinah.

btw drugače pa hvala za tole Hansenovo. Ob prebiranju njenih tekstov se izredno zabavam LOL

najprej te prosim, da v bodoče objaviš linke na članke, ne celotnih člankov.

naslednje:

NARTH (prvi članek) je zloglasna kvazi-znastvena organizacija, ki med drugim zagovarja “spreminjanje spolne usmerjenosti”, kar so obsodila vsa mogoča strokovna zduženja (beri: nobenih dokazov, da deluje, veliko dokazov, da je škodljivo).

članki “raziskovalcev” NARTHA niso in nikoli ne bodo objavljeni v nobeni relevatni, indeksirani znanstveni publikaciji, ker pač niso..ups…znanstveni… Biblija te vloge pač nima.

v znanstveni skupnosti nima NOBENEGA ugleda, zato pa nešteto primerov, ko so jih ujeli pri potvarjanju, manipuliranju in laži – skratka… s Strehovcem so res krasen par.

Primerov tega, ko so raziskovalci skočili v zrak, ker je NARTH zlorabil in ponaredil njihove raziskave, je na spletu polno… dajmo vsaj en primer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64A2HrvYdYQ

By Trayce Hansen, Ph.D.
http://www.drtraycehansen.com

Research by social scientists, although not definitive, suggests that children reared by openly homosexual parents are far more likely to engage in homosexual behavior than children raised by others. Studies thus far find between 8% and 21% of homosexually parented children ultimately identify as non-heterosexual. For comparison purposes, approximately 2% of the general population are non-heterosexual. Therefore, if these percentages continue to hold true, children of homosexuals have a 4 to 10 times greater likelihood of developing a non-heterosexual preference than other children.
http://www.drtraycehansen.com/Pages/writings_prohomo.html

S. J. QUINNEY COLLEGE OF LAW
Journal Of Law & Family Studies
University Of Utah
VOLUME 6 NUMBER 2

View/Download as PDF

I. INTRODUCTION

The notion that all “family forms” are equally as helpful or healthful for children has no basis in science. Indeed, there is no better example than the extensive research on children reared in single-parent families. The most authoritative evidence on children growing up in single-parent families (most often headed by single mothers) concluded that such children are three times more likely to have a child out of wedlock, twice as likely to drop out of high school, 1.4 times more likely to be idle (out of school and out of work) and 2.5 times more likely to be teen mothers. Lest one might suggest that the lower socio-economic level of children alone accounts for such statistics, these conclusions were reached subsequent to adjustments for income-related variables such as race, sex, mother’s/father’s education, number of siblings, and place of residence (McLanahan & Sandefur, 1994). Perhaps, if we follow these statistics further, another picture emerges. Of children born out-of-wedlock, their chances of living in poverty are five times greater than that of growing up within intact families. Additionally, children born out of wedlock have a two to three times greater probability of having psychiatric problems as adolescents (Popenoe, 1996). Following this statistic even further, early sexual activity poses a great danger for adolescent health. Adolescents account for more than 25 percent of all sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) nationally. Women are twice as likely as men to acquire gonorrhea, chlamydia and hepatitis.
http://www.narth.com/docs/gendercomplementarity.html