glede tržnega deleža: sam apple je napovedal, da pričakujejo tržni delež tam nekje okrog 1 %. niso to žemljice.

But the potentially powerful combination of Cingular and Apple may not be as attractive to consumers as they hope, said Roger Entner, a wireless industry analyst with Ovum Research. Mr. Entner said the device would doubtless be state of the art, but that is not the whole battle. He noted that some laptop computers are cheaper than the $499 iPhone.

“Is it futuristic? Yes,” Mr. Entner said. “Is it affordable? No.”

Mr. Entner said phones costing $500 or more represent less than 1 percent of those sold in the United States. As a result, he said, Apple could initially be competing for the attention of a few million consumers who rely on advanced devices like the Treo from Palm Inc. and the BlackBerry from Research In Motion. “This sets a high bar for the high-end device, but on the low end it has no impact,” Mr. Entner said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/10/business/10cingular.html

no, ja… razvoj ne gre tako hitro. verjamem pa, da bo kaka nokia hitro pobrala ideje in predstavila kaj podobnega….

Stylus ni nujen nikjer, če imaš dovolj male prste. In obratno, če so dovolj veliki, boš imel tudi na iPhone težave.

Kot rečeno, izvedba, ki je v en izdelek potegnila mnogo idej, ki so se valjale naokoli, na prvi videz deluje dobro, praksa bo pa pokazala, ali je dejansko tako. Sam sicer ne dvomim, da bo tudi slednja pokazala, da se telefon odlično obnese za večino tankoprstih uporabnikov, ki niso slepi ali motorično hendikepirani, ampak ne vem pa zakaj bi odlično izvedbo poimenoval tudi revolucionarna.

Malo skepse pa ne škodi nikomur, še najmanj bi pa tebi.

Do takrat bodo tekmeci pogruntali marsikaj.