Arhiv 2007
links for 2007-01-04
| 4. January 2007 | | Jure
-
Post2PDF
links for 2007-01-03
| 3. January 2007 | | Jure
Le nasmeh je bolj grenak
| 3. January 2007 | | Jure
Prej medijski masaker, sedaj naslov osebnosti leta. Fotografije so vsekakor odlične.
The most business-friendly socialism
| 3. January 2007 | | Jure
Chávez’s rhetoric might not be out of place in “The Little Red Book,” yet everyday life for many Venezuelans today looks more like the Neiman-Marcus catalogue. Thanks to the boom in the price of oil, many Venezuelans have been indulging in rampant consumerism… In the past year, auto sales have doubled, property prices have soared (mortgage loans are up three hundred per cent)… And while Chávez has done a good job of redistributing oil revenue to the … poor … to improve education, health care, and housing, and has forced oil companies to renegotiate contracts, there has been no nationalization of industry, relatively little interference with markets, and only small gestures toward land reform. If this is socialism, it’s the most business-friendly socialism ever devised. Več
Bloganje?
| 3. January 2007 | | Jure
Bloger kot cinik:
According to Peter Sloterdijk, cynicism is “enlightened false consciousness”. A cynic, so Sloterdijk says, is someone who is part of an institution or group whose existence and values he himself can no longer see as absolute, necessary, and unconditional, and who is miserable due to this enlightenment, because he or she sticks to principles he or she does not believe in.
The only knowledge left for a cynic is trust in reason, which, however, cannot provide him (or her) with a firm basis for action, yet another reason for being miserable. Following Sloterdijk, cynicism is a common problem. The question of whether it is universal or limited to Western societies is too big to be discussed here, but most certainly we see it on a global scale in knowledge-intensive sectors.
in pisanje blogov kot nihilistični impulz:
Nihilism designates the impossibility of opposition – a state of affairs which, unsurprisingly, generates a great deal of anxiety. Nihilism is not a monolithic belief system. We no longer “believe” in Nothing as in nineteenth-century Russia or post-war Paris. Nihilism is no longer a danger or problem, but the default postmodern condition. It is an unremarkable, even banal feature of life, as Karen Carr writes is and no longer related to the Religious Question. Blogs are neither religious nor secular. They are “post-virtue”. The paradoxical temporality of nihilism today is that of a not-quite-already-Now. Following Giorgio Agamben, Justin Clements writes that “nihilism is not just another epoch amongst a succession of others: it is the finally accomplished form of a disaster that occurred long ago.” In the media context this would be the moment in which mass media lost their claim on the Truth and could no longer operate as authority. Let us not date this event in time, as such an insightful moment can be both personal and cultural-historical. It is the move from the festive McLuhan to the nihilist Baudrillard that every media user is going through, found in the ungroundedness of networked discourse that users fool around with.
Loading ...
